Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Using Home Equity to Fund Retirement

Print Friendly

Key changes recently were made in reverse mortgages. You should be aware of the changes and how they affect the way reverse mortgages can help increase your financial independence. Properly used, they are tools for employing home equity to enhance your retirement.

The first change is that the Federal Housing Administration restructured the program again for the loans its guarantees. Since the FHA guarantees most reverse mortgages these days, it sets the rules for most borrowers.

The FHA calls the loans Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM). In September 2013, FHA replaced two types of loans (HECM Standard and HECM Saver) with today's HECM. The basic rules are the same. You have to be at least age 62 and own your principal residence outright or have paid-down a "considerable amount" of the debt. You can borrow only against your principal residence and must have sufficient resources to pay your property taxes, insurance, homeowners' association dues, and similar expenses. You also have to participate in an information session with a HUD-approved counselor before taking the loan.

Under a HECM, you receive money from a lender today, but no payments are due on the loan until you no longer occupy the residence. The principal, interest, and fees on the loan accumulate and eventually are paid from the sale proceeds of the home.

A federally-insured HECM is made by a private lender but is guaranteed by the FHA. Any portion of the loan balance that can't be paid from the home sale proceeds is covered by the government. If the home's value exceeds the debt, your heirs can keep the excess.

You have to pay a range of fees: mortgage insurance, an origination fee, a servicing fee, and the usual third party charges (appraisal, title search, inspections, surveys, recording fees, etc.). The origination fee can be as high as $6,000, depending on the value of your home. You have the choice of payin! g most of the fees upfront or having them added to the loan balance.

A little-known provision of the law requires the lender to offer you or your heirs a choice when the loan is due. They can allow the home to be foreclosed and the sale proceeds used to cover the loan. Or they can extinguish the debt by paying 95% of the home's current value, no matter how much is owed on the loan. If the loan amount is more than 95% of the home's value, the government will make up the loss to the lender. If you take out a HECM, be sure your heirs are aware of the option.

Another change since the financial crisis is most of the big-name lenders have left the HECM market. The number of HECMs issued rose steadily until home prices collapsed in many areas. For that and other reasons the major banks exited the market. Most HECM lenders now are smaller firms and not well-known.

The New York Times recently reported that some HECM lenders don't offer the repayment choice to next of kin and proceed immediately to foreclosure. You want to choose your lender carefully and let your loved ones know what you're doing and what their rights are when the loan is due.

The amount you can borrow depends on the value of your home, your age, and current interest rates. The older you are, the more you can borrow. The lower interest rates are, the more you can borrow.

For example, at recent interest rates, a 62 year old could borrow 52.6% of the home's value but only 34.3% if rates rise four percentage points. A 75 year old could borrow 58.9% today and 43.9% at the higher rate.

The changes and low interest rates mean you should take a fresh look at the HECM. I've generally regarded the HECM as a last resort for people late in life who needed cash and wanted to stay in their homes. By waiting until late in life you maximize the amount that can be borrowed and limit lifetime expenses for the mortgage.

But now there are other ways to consider using HECMS.

You can choose several ways to ! take a HE! CM, including a line of credit. Some call this the Standby HECM. You lock in the amount you can borrow at today's interest rates by establishing a line of credit but don't take money now. Instead, use the loan strategically to preserve your nest egg.

One research paper showed how a line of credit HECM could be used to avoid drawing principal from the investment portfolio when markets are down. After a steep portfolio decline, instead of selling some investments and further reducing investment principal to pay living expenses, you draw on the HECM line of credit and keep more of the investments intact for the market recovery.

The study found that the retiree's resources lasted longer if the HECM was tapped whenever the portfolio was less than 80% of its "glide path" or expected value in the retirement plan. But using the HECM more often was not an advantage. Tapping the HECM before the nest egg declined below the 80% level reduced the life of the nest egg. Another key to the strategy is that the HECM loan is repaid after the markets recover and the investment portfolio increases.

Having the HECM line of credit available also reduces the amount of cash and other short-term investments that need to be held in the portfolio. That increases the potential investment return over the long-term.

The HECM line of credit can have other uses.

It can help you delay Social Security benefits and a pension or other annuity payout. The older you are when these benefits begin, the higher the income. With Social Security, the benefits increase 8% for each year of delay to age 70. That is less than current cost of the HECM and higher than the return you'll receive elsewhere.

A HECM also can help reduce your tax burden. In years when you need extra money for an unexpected expense, instead of taking more money from a qualified retirement plan or taxable account and getting pushed into a higher tax bracket, you can draw on the HECM. Since it is a loan, there are no income taxes! on it.

Also, payments for large assets or unexpected expenses, such as automobiles or medical expenses, can be made by drawing on a HECM line of credit. You might not want to take additional money from your portfolio and forego the opportunity to earn returns. You can tap the HECM and either repay that loan with future investment gains or let it be paid after you no longer live in the residence.

There are other potential uses of the HECM, but don't fall for some of the scams or unwise strategies being peddled. Don't use a HECM to buy an annuity or life insurance or to finance a vacation.

A reverse mortgage can be an important income management tool. Always keep in mind, however, that it isn't free money. Interest is compounding on the loan, and you incur expenses to take out the loan. To the extent you have an outstanding reverse mortgage on your passing, there won't be equity in your home for your heirs to inherit.

New Hire Roundup: Curian Capital Names Czaicki CIO

This week in personnel announcements and new hires, Walt Czaicki was named CIO of Curian Capital; the SEC brought in Stephanie Avakian as deputy director of enforcement; Brian Donovan went to Mercer; C&A Consulting welcomed Danielle Crimmins; and Adam Phillips joined EP Wealth Advisors.

Also, Tony Miles was named a trustee of the Investor Protection Trust (IPT); Frank O’Connor joined the Insured Retirement Institute (IRI); J.D. Power added Mike Foy; T. Rowe Price announced a coming transition in portfolio management; and Ken Carraro joined the Private Client Reserve of U.S. Bank in Portland, Ore.

Curian Capital Names Czaicki CIO

Curian Capital LLC has announced that Walt Czaicki has been named senior vice president of the asset management group (AMG) and chief investment officer for the company. He will remain in Denver and report to Michael Bell, president and chief executive officer.

Czaicki, with more than 25 years of investment management experience, previously served as a senior portfolio manager with AllianceBernstein. From 2005 to 2007, he was vice president and director of portfolio management at Curian. He rejoined Curian in 2011 and served as vice president of platform management for the AMG.

Avakian Joins SEC as Deputy Director of Enforcement

The SEC has announced that Stephanie Avakian has been named deputy director of its division of enforcement. The appointment is effective in late June.

Avakian joins from the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, where she is a partner in the New York office and a vice chair of the firm’s securities practice.  She previously worked in the SEC’s enforcement division as a branch chief in the New York regional office, and later served as a counsel to SEC Commissioner Paul Carey.

Mercer Welcomes Donovan

Mercer has announced that Brian Donovan has joined as global product leader in its investments business. He is based in Boston and will report jointly to Phil de Cristo, president, investments and Sujata Mutalik, global CFO, investments.

Donovan brings more than 30 years of investment related experience to this position. Most recently, he served as vice president, investment product development at Pyramis Global Advisors, a Fidelity Investments company. He has also held several prior leadership positions with Fidelity.

Crimmins Goes to C&A Consulting

C&A Consulting LLC has announced that Danielle Crimmins has been hired as director of the firm’s new family office consulting services practice.

Crimmins’s prior experience includes leading multiple family office software implementations and providing client support for an asset management system.

EP Wealth Advisors Adds Phillips

EP Wealth Advisors has announced that Adam Phillips has joined as senior vice president and investment strategist.

Prior to joining, Phillips spent nine years at City National Bank in Beverly Hills working with high-net-worth individuals, foundations and trusts.

Miles Named Trustee at IPT

Investor Protection Trust has announced that Tony Miles, District of Columbia associate commissioner for securities, will succeed Elizabeth Block as a trustee. Block, the New York assistant attorney general, retired from the attorney general’s office in April.

Miles has been the associate commissioner, securities, in the Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking (DISB) since July of 2000, and has served in numerous capacities at NASAA. He came to DISB from the National Science Foundation, where he was the deputy general counsel. Immediately prior to that, he was vice president for legal affairs and corporate secretary of National Public Radio. He has also held senior legal positions in various federal regulatory agencies, including the division of trading and markets of the SEC and the economic regulatory administration of the U.S. Department of Energy.

IRI Welcomes O’Connor

Frank O’Connor has joined the Insured Retirement Institute as vice president of research and outreach.

Most recently O’Connor was product manager, asset manager annuity solutions at Morningstar Inc. O’Connor was director of product development for Finetre Corp.’s VARDS Online, before it was acquired by Morningstar in 2005. Following the acquisition, he held various positions at Morningstar. Earlier, he was an executive benefits consultant from 1997 to 2001.

Foy Added at J.D. Power

J.D. Power has announced that Mike Foy has joined as the director of its wealth management practice. He will work out of McGraw Hill Financial’s Hightstown, N.J., office. He reports to Rocky Clancy, vice president of financial services, and will work with Craig Martin, who previously served as the director of the wealth management practice. Martin remains at J.D. Power and will focus more on the mortgage industry and expanding the firm’s capabilities across the financial services sector.

Foy has worked in the wealth management industry for more than 15 years. He joins from Penton Media, where he was director of research and strategic sales for the financial services group. Previously, he held senior business and product development and marketing positions at HNW, and at Dow Jones and Merrill Lynch.

CIO Rogers to Step Down as Portfolio Manager at T. Rowe Price

T. Rowe Price has announced that at the end of October 2015, Brian Rogers will step down as portfolio manager of the T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund. He will be succeeded by John Linehan, but will remain as chairman and CIO.

Linehan is currently co-portfolio manager of the Institutional Large-Cap Value Fund and head of U.S. equity. He will continue as co-portfolio manager of the fund, but will be succeeded as head of U.S. equity by Bill Stromberg, head of equity.

Ken Carraro Joins Private Client Reserve

U.S. Bank Wealth Management has announced that Ken Carraro has joined the Private Client Reserve of U.S. Bank in Portland, Ore., as vice president, wealth management advisor.

Prior to joining The Reserve, Carraro was an international banker for U.S. Bank in Portland and has lived and worked in Austria, France and Central Africa.

---

Read the May 28 New Hire Roundup at ThinkAdvisor.

 

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Warren Buffett's Latest Words of Wisdom

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway meeting for shareholders this weekend let investors - not just Berkshire (NYSE: BRK.A; BRK.B) investors - get some nuggets of wisdom from the 83-year-old billionaire.

warren buffett's Berkshire Hathaway meeting Berkshire's earnings are meticulously scrutinized every quarter because its investments include a number of well-known consumer-oriented components. Stock holdings include American Express Co. (NYSE: AXP), Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO), Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM), International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM), and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT).

Also closely examined and widely attended is Berkshire's annual shareholder meeting. Following are five highlights from Saturday's event, which drew some 38,000 shareholders, analysts, and journalists.

Five Highlights from Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Meeting During the Q&A session, Buffett was asked to name the one stock he'd put all of his net worth into. Asked the same question during the 2009 annual meeting, Buffett answered Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). Since then, WFC shares have surged some 150%, comfortably beating the S&P 500's returns over the same period. This time around, Buffett not only didn't say Wells Fargo, he politely declined to answer. Investors clamoring to hear about Buffett's latest buys will have to wait until Berkshire's next 13F SEC filing. The question of if and when Berkshire will pay a dividend comes up early and often at Buffett's shareholder meeting. The answer is always the same. Buffett says he believes reinvesting Berkshire's cash is worth more for shareholders than they would receive in a dividend. As Buffett controls 34% of the company's voting power, any dividend proposal is highly unlikely to pass without his support. And, since Buffett' s eldest son Howard is slated to keep watch over Berkshire's culture when his father is no longer running the company, investors shouldn't expect a dividend when that time comes. What investors can expect are more global deals. Buffett said Berkshire very much wants to invest around the world. "We have not had as much luck getting on the radar screen of owners around the world as we have in the United States," Buffett said. "I've been a little disappointed that we haven't had as much luck outside the country." Any new deals are apt to be big given that Berkshire's massive size requires it go after large targets for growth. Buffett also said he'd like to partner again with 3G Capital, the Brazilian firm he teamed with in 2013 to buy H.J. Heinz in a $23.3 billion deal. "We're very likely to partner with them, perhaps on some things that are very large," Buffett said. He added, "What we really want to do at our present size and scope (is) buy big businesses with good management and prices, and then build them over time." Indeed, much of Berkshire's growth has come from acquisitions. At the end of Q1, Berkshire's cash stash stood at a whopping $48 billon. Buffett acknowledged the company's cash was accumulating at such a rapid rate that the day may be fast approaching when they would run out of ways to "intelligently invest" the cash. But, Berkshire will never feel the need to spend the cash simply for the sake of spending. Buffett said Berkshire would mull engaging in future stock buybacks, adding the company will repurchase shares should they dip below 1.2 times book value. With significant investments in utilities and natural gas, Berkshire is also a staunch proponent of alternative energy. Buffett believes a substantial percentage of Iowa's (his home state) energy needs can be met with wind power within five years.

BRK.A shares slumped 1.28%, or $2,458, to $189,797 in afternoon trading Monday. The "Baby Berks" (NYSE: BRK.B), which represent 1/1,500 the price and 1/10,000 voting right of Class A shares, slipped 1.26%, or $1.61, at $126.48.

Today's Top Story: It's time to look at the BRICS, and the global economic balance, with a totally new set of glasses. Because an emerging market game changer is here...

Related Articles:

CNN Money:
Berkshire's Munger Wants 1% to Take Pay Cut

The New York Times:
Berkshire Hathaway's 2014 Shareholder Meeting
Reuters:
Buffett Defends Coke, BNSF at Berkshire Annual Meeting

Monday, December 29, 2014

Investment Manna in the Middle East

Print FriendlyIsrael has become a huge economic success story despite getting off to a rough start more than 60 years ago.

Surrounded by hostile neighbors, the country fought five wars in the first two decades of its existence. Then, after securing its position in the region, it battled hyperinflation with annual rates as high as 950 percent in the 1980s.

While the violence in Israel has subsided, the country is still no stranger to controversy and strife. American actress Scarlett Johansson was recently forced to step down as an Oxfam ambassador after accepting an endorsement deal from SodaStream International (NSDQ: SODA), an Israeli company whose manufacturing plant is in the West Bank, and occasional bombings and gun attacks are still a fact of life there.

There are still other problems. Bank of Israel Governor Karnit Flug has said the country must reduce spending by ILS12 billion and find another ILS8 billion in tax revenue to reach its 2015 budget deficit target of 2.5 percent of gross domestic product. The central bank's annual report also points out that a red hot housing market and a high poverty rate must be addressed.

Still, the country learned its economic lessons from its early history and has come to be hailed as a successful "start-up nation," fostering businesses such as SodaStream and a host of others, thanks to friendly regulations and strong fiscal and monetary policies.

Israel also began production of its offshore Tamar gas field, making its first delivery of natural gas just a few days ago. The field is expected to deliver about 985 million cubic feet of gas per day, or about 10 billion cubic meters annually. Development of the field added 1 percent to the country's economic growth last year and is expected to add 0.3 percent this year, a figure that should rise as more customers for the gas are secured.

Those efforts are already well underway amid a noticeable thaw i! n Israeli-Turkish relations over the past year or so, with the two countries considering the construction of a pipeline to move some of that gas to Turkey. Not only would that sort of deal boost the economies of both countries, it would also lay the foundations for friendlier relations going forward.

Thanks to the country’s proactive steps to address economic concerns and its commitment to business and development, Standard and Poor's (S&P) recently affirmed Israel's "A+" credit rating and has begun ranking the country as "high income." S&P also said that it expects the country's annual per capita income to rise from its current level of about $38,000 to $42,000 by 2017. Just five years ago the average income was just $28,000.

Unlike dicier situations in many foreign markets, Israeli-US relations have been close for decades now, helping to make it easy for US investors to access Israeli stocks. In fact, Israel-based companies are the third most listed on US exchanges behind China and Canada. In 2013, about half of all the Israeli companies listed in the US ended the year with gains of 30 percent or more and, after the flat first quarter, most of them are outperforming so far this year as well.

One of my favorites is Caesarstone Sdot-Yam (NSDQ: CSTE), which manufacturers premium quartz surfaces for countertops, bathrooms, tables or just about anywhere you'd want a quartz surface.

While the company was founded in 1987 it has only traded on the NASDAQ since 2012. Since then its share price has more than quadrupled, driven by earnings growth of more than 14 percent. Since 2009, the company’s annual revenue has grown from $162.6 million to $356.6 million last year.

About 35 percent of the company's total sales last year were in the US, where Caesarstone purchased one of its primary competitors and its distributor. A quarter of its sales were in Australia, 14 percent in Canada, 12 percent in Israel and 6 percent in Europe. The remainder ! falls int! o a broad "rest of world" category.

Caesarstone has benefited from a comprehensive marketing strategy that doesn't rely on a single sales channel; you'll find its ads in consumer magazines and on television, at tradeshows for builders, sales reps visiting architects and a host of in-store displays. It also benefits from having a widely acknowledged superior product protected by technical know-how that helps the company to outshine competitors.

Given the improving pace of economic growth in Israel and the spur it provides to both home and commercial construction, Caesarstone's sales growth should continue its upward trajectory for at least the next few years. The company is anticipating this future prosperity; it recently added a fifth Israeli manufacturing line in the second quarter of this year and plans a US plant sometime next year.

Caesarstone Sdot-Yam rates a buy up to 61.

Sunday, December 28, 2014

3 Biotech Stocks Where Momentum is Alive and Well

Who says momentum investing is dead?

There are those that say the partying of 2013 will end with a hangover in 2014. Leading the way lower or at best sideways will be the former momentum stocks of last year.

What a bunch of party poopers.

One sector where those with a proclivity to risk will have their fun is the biotech industry.

Case in point is Intercept Pharmaceuticals (ICPT). The little biotech company specializing in treatments for liver disease exploded in a wave of momentum last week.

The stock jumped an amazing 500% in just two days of trading after reporting encouraging trial results for its OCA drug.

Talk about the Holy Grail of momentum investing. The Intercept story is so impressive that not even a whack of 35% or more the next week can knock the bloom off the rose.

The stock is still up well over 100% in just a few trading sessions. It's almost as if every momentum investor in stocks like Tesla (TSLA) or Netflix (NFLX) all jumped into Intercept.

Now the hunt is on for more. Investors are scouring the biotech landscape looking for the next Intercept. The action is sure to bid up shares across the board.

Given that predicting monster drugs coming to market is a crapshoot at best, investors can either gain exposure to the group with an exchange traded fund or roll the dice on a select few biotech stocks.

If you want to swing for the fences, here are three names in the biotech space that have the potential to attract the momentum investors in a big way.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

REGN-LOGO.regeneronIf a relatively unknown bio-pharm stock with a narrow focus can soar 500%, imagine what a more diversified biotech stock with a pipeline of promising drugs can do for investors?

Regeneron (REGN) shares could see a big jump in 2014. The big promise in the year is with respect to expansion of its eye treatment product, Eylea. Analysts expect the company to grow profits by more than 50% in 2014. At current prices shares trade for 54 times 2014 estimated earnings. That's a rich premium, but not nosebleed compared to some momentum stocks. The real potential for growth to be even larger than expected is what turns on the momentum ground and as other rocket ships come back to earth look for this one to keep on climbing.

Questcor Pharmaceuticals

Questcor-logoLike Regeneron, Questcor (QCOR) should benefit from the growth of an existing product, Acthar Gel. This one took a pause at the end of year on questions surrounding marketing practices – specifically improper payments to doctors.

Putting that aside for a moment, the value here is compelling. Analysts expect the company to grow profits in 2014 by 23%. At current prices, shares trade for only 8 times earnings.

What you ultimately have with Questcor are two very strong, opposing forces. Shorts will take questions about the marketing and claim fraud hoping to push shares lower. Longs will see further expansion of the company's products and the low valuation. I'd bet on the momentum longs here.

Emergent Bio Solutions

EMERGENT.biosolutions.logoIf you are into "big game" momentum-hunting in the biotech space, make sure to include small caps in your search. To the extent a smaller company scores an approval for a key drug in a monster market, the gains would likely mimic what we have seen with Intercept.

I discovered Emergent Bio Solutions (EBS) when I ran my proprietary P/E Gap model at the end of December. Without getting into the details, P/E Gap identifies stocks that have the potential to rally based on being significantly undervalued.

Analysts expect Emergent to grow profits by 50% in 2014. At current prices shares trade for 21 times 2014 estimated earnings. The company is engaged in the defense industry developing serums for dealing with bio and chemical warfare. With the new budget deal, increased spending by the government will likely result in Emergent exceeding current expectations. If so, this one catches fire for sure.

Will Americans Get Our Tax Breaks Back?

A tax form calculator broken pencil and bent paper clip shot the frustration of filing taxesAlamy Even under the best of circumstances, it's hard to understand the tax code well enough to do smart tax planning. But when you can't even be certain what the tax laws are going to be in the year ahead, planning becomes almost impossible. Unfortunately, lawmakers left millions of Americans in exactly that situation when they left for their winter break without making a final decision on whether to extend dozens of tax breaks that save American families and businesses billions of dollars. Those provisions expired Monday, meaning taxpayers will have to hope for the best but plan for the worst over these valuable tax breaks. What's At Stake

Saturday, December 27, 2014

Dow Hits Another Record, but Lumber Liquidators and Fresh Market Tumble

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over daily movements, we do like to keep an eye on market changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

You wouldn't be remiss to think a rising stock market is now one of life's guarantees alongside death and taxes. Week after week this year, stocks have moved inexorably higher, despite a weak economy, the government's recurring inability to make the most basic decisions, and federal spending cuts. Today, the S&P 500 closed above 1,800 for the first time today, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) moved further into uncharted territory north of 16,000, both scoring their seventh straight weekly gains. Even the Nasdaq is less than a percentage point from hitting 4,000, after gaining more than 30% this year. Yesterday's enthusiasm about Janet Yellen's preliminary confirmation and a strong unemployment claims report seemed to carry over to today, lifting the S&P 500 0.5% and the Dow up 0.3%.

Despite the broad market gains, not every stock was a winner today. Shares of Lumber Liquidators (NYSE: LL  ) were getting taken to the woodshed, falling 12% after Whitney Tilson, head of the Kase Capital Management hedge fund, announced a short position in the high-flying wood-flooring specialist. At an investor conference, Tilson noted a government investigation into potentially illegal timber imports by Lumber Liquidators, and suggested the company's gross margins, which have improved to better than 40% lately, were too good to be true. The hedge fund manager also cited a report from the non-profit Environmental Investigative Agency that said Lumber Liquidators' purchases "have fueled rampant illegal logging in Eastern Russia." Shares of the flooring retailer had more than doubled this year before today's drop, riding the broader housing recovery.

The Fresh Market (NASDAQ: TFM  ) also took one on the chin, falling 19% after an across-the-board poor quarterly earnings report. The Whole Foods rival reported flat per-share profit growth at $0.23, missing estimates of $0.26. Sales also fell short, growing 13% to $364 million, and same-store sales improved only modestly by 3.1%. Management cited "increasingly challenging economic conditions" for the rough quarter, but the company's outlook also came up weak as the Fresh Market guided for full-year EPS of $1.42.-$1.47, below the consensus at $1.53. For a company that calls itself "high growth" and a stock that's priced similarly, Fresh Market will need bottom-line growth above 10% to keep shares from falling even more.

Thinking about rebalancing?
The market stormed out to huge gains across 2013, leaving investors on the sidelines burned. However, opportunistic investors can still find huge winners. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has just hand-picked one such opportunity in our new report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." To find out which stock it is and read our in-depth report, simply click here. It's free!

Which Order To Use? Stop-Loss Or Stop-Limit Orders

Traders and investors who seek to limit potential losses can use several types of orders that can get them into and out of the market at times when they may not be able to place an order manually. Stop-loss and stop-limit orders are two such order types that can accomplish this. But it is critical to understand the difference.

Stop Loss Orders

There are two types of stop-loss orders:

1) Sell-stop orders protect long positions by triggering a market sell order if the price falls below a certain level. The underlying assumption behind this strategy is that if the price falls this far, it may continue to fall much further, so the loss is capped by selling at this price.

Example:

Frank owns 1,000 shares of ABC stock. He purchased the stock at $30 a share, and it has risen to $45 on rumors of a potential buyout. He wants to lock in a gain of at least $10 per share, so he places a sell-stop order at $41. If the stock drops back below this price, then the order will become a market order and get filled at the current market price, which may be more (or more likely less) than the stop-loss price of $41. In this case, Frank might get $41 for 500 shares and $40.50 for the rest. But he will get to keep most of his gain.

2) Buy-stop orders are conceptually the same as sell stops except that they are used to protect short positions. A buy-stop order price will be above the current market price and will trigger if the price rises above that level.

Stop-Limit Orders

These orders are similar to stop-loss orders, but as their name states, there is a limit on the price at which they will execute. There are two prices specified in a stop-limit order; the stop price that will convert the order to a sell order, and the limit price. Instead of the order becoming a market order to sell, the sell order becomes a limit order that will only execute at the limit price or better. Of course, there is no guarantee that this order will be filled, especially if the stock price is rising or falling rapidly. Stop-limit orders are sometimes used because if the price of the stock or other security falls below the limit, then the investor does not want to sell and is willing to wait for the price to rise back to the limit price.

Example:

Frank's ABC stock never drops to the stop-loss price, but it continues to rise and eventually reaches $50 a share. He cancels his stop-loss order at $41 and puts in a stop limit order at $47 with a limit of $45. If the stock price falls below $47, then the order becomes a live sell-limit order. If the stock price falls below $45 before Frank's order is filled, then the order will remain unfilled until the price climbs back to $45.

Many investors will cancel their limit orders if the stock price falls below the limit price, because they placed them solely to limit their loss when the price was dropping. Since they missed their chance to get out, they will then simply wait for the price to go back up and may not wish to sell at that limit price at that point, because the stock may continue to rise. If Frank could not get out at $45 or better and the stock price falls back to $40, then he may be wise to cancel the order, because if it rises back to $45, it may keep going.

As with buy-stop-loss orders, buy-stop-limit orders are used for short sales where the investor is willing to risk waiting for the price to come back down if the purchase is not made at the limit price or better.

Benefits and Risks

Stop-loss and stop-limit orders can provide different types of protection for investors. Stop-loss orders can guarantee execution, but not price. And price slippage frequently occurs upon execution. Most sell-stop orders are filled at a price below the strike price; the amount of difference depends on how fast the price is dropping. An order may get filled for a considerably lower price if the price is plummeting quickly.

Stop-limit orders can guarantee a price limit, but the trade may not be executed. This can saddle the investor with a substantial loss in a fast market, because the limit price may not get filled before the market price drops below that amount. If bad news comes out about a company and the limit price is only $1 or $2 below the stop-loss price, then the investor must hold onto the stock for an indeterminate period before the share price rises again. Both types of orders can be entered as either day or good-until-canceled (GTC) orders.

Choosing which type of order to use essentially boils down to deciding which type of risk is better to take. The first step to using either type of order correctly is to carefully assess how the stock is trading. If the stock is volatile with substantial price movement, then a stop-limit order may be more effective because of its price guarantee. If the trade doesn't execute, then the investor may only have to wait a short time for the price to rise again. A stop-loss order would be appropriate if, for example, bad news comes out about a company that casts doubt upon its long-term future. In this case, the stock price may not return to its current level for months or years, if it ever does, and investors would therefore be wise to cut their losses and take the market price on the sale. A stop-limit order may yield a considerably larger loss if it does not execute.

Another important factor to consider when placing either type of order is where to set the stop and limit prices. Technical analysis can be a useful tool here, and stop-loss prices are often placed at levels of technical support or resistance. Investors who place stop-loss orders on stocks that are steadily climbing should take care to give the stock a little room to fall back, because if they set their stop price too close to the current market price, they may get stopped out due to a relatively small retracement in price. Then they would miss out on the next major surge when the price starts to rise again.

The Bottom Line

Stop-loss and stop-limit orders can provide different types of protection for both long and short investors. Stop-loss orders guarantee execution, while stop-limit orders guarantee price. For more information on these and other types of investment trades, consult your broker or financial advisor.

Thursday, December 25, 2014

1 Stock to Buy in June

Every month, I do my level best to help the world invest better by publicly calling out the company that I'll be buying to add to my Roth IRA. I've been doing this for almost two years, and my picks have returned a total of almost 23%, beating the S&P 500 by just under 3 percentage points.

Last week, I introduced five companies I was considering as my stock pick for the month: Nuverra Environmental, Apple , IPG Photonics   (NASDAQ: IPGP  ) , Dangdang, and SodaStream . Today, I'm going to tell you about the company I'm picking, the reasons why, and offer access to a special free report at the end of the article.

June's winner is...
As soon as trading rules allow, I'll be adding shares of laser maker IPG Photonics to my Roth IRA. To review the basic argument I laid out in my previous article: IPG's shares took a hit after earnings were announced in early May. The reason was that margins were compressed and Wall Street was worried about the company's long-term profitability.

But after listening to the conference call, it became clear that this margin compression was a conscious decision to forgo short-term profitability for long-term market share. IPG offered its lasers to customers at discounted rates in order to drive adoption. I believe that once buyers see how the company's fiber-optic lasers are superior to the carbon-based variety that dominate most industries now, they'll become lifelong customers of IPG -- willing to pay full price for all their future purchases.

What's so special about these lasers?

Source: IPG Photonics. 

If you aren't familiar with lasers, the carbon-based variety has been the industry standard for years. IPG was a first mover in developing fiber-optic lasers. Although at first fiber-optic lasers were more expensive and less powerful, technological progress has changed the situation considerably.

In fact, the progression of fiber-optic lasers follows a well-documented path for many disruptive innovators.

Source: Author, based on The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton Christensen.

Here, the blue line represents carbon-based lasers, while fiber-optic lasers are the red line. We likely just passed the inflection point now where red is beating blue.

Right now, 88% of IPG's sales come from the materials processing industry -- which focuses on cutting and welding large pieces of metal. The rest is made up by the advanced applications, communications, and medical industries.

The latter three make up interesting growth opportunity for IPG. Because the company claims that its lasers are more powerful, energy efficient, reliable, and cheaper than what the rest of the industry has to offer, IPG could easily diversify its customer base over the coming decade.

Speaking of the rest of the industry...
Of course, just because IPG was the first major company to design fiber-optic lasers doesn't mean it's impervious to competition. There are four other major players in the fray, but none has the focus and scope that IPG offers. Specifically, IPG focuses on fiber-optic lasers exclusively, and is vertically integrated -- meaning that all parts are made and assembled in house -- which helps bring the price of IPG's lasers down.

Rofin-Sinar (NASDAQ: RSTI  ) , Coherent (NASDAQ: COHR  ) , Newport (NASDAQ: NEWP  ) , and JDS Uniphase (NASDAQ: JDSU  ) all offer fiber-optic lasers as well.

When it comes to JDS, its important to realize that the company's focus is far broader than IPG's, focusing primarily on communications solutions. Although that covers an area where IPG competes, communications accounted for just 4% of IPG's sales in 2012.

That leaves Rofin, Coherent, and Newport as the primary competition. But a huge weakness each of these companies have is that they also count heavily on carbon-based lasers for a bulk of their revenue. That means that the company's attention is split, and that in order to develop fiber lasers, they will have to cannibalize their traditional carbon-based offerings.

In 2012, Rofin-Sinar noted that revenues were down significantly for carbon lasers, while the only segment producing positive trends were fiber optics.

Coherent recently reported that revenue for its material processing fiber-optic lasers jumped 16% from the previous year. That's not bad, but it's nowhere near the 29% increase IPG experienced in the same sector over the same time frame.

And Newport announced that net sales actually dropped during the first quarter of 2013 by 16%, which caused earnings to plummet almost 60%! 

Clearly, though I'm sure the lasers these companies offer are fine, they aren't as advanced as IPG's, and the corporate structure doesn't allow for such focused marketing and development of the new wave of lasers.

How to proceed
As I said, when trading rules allow, I'll be buying about $450 worth of IPG stock, as that's 1/12th the allowance for a Roth IRA.  I think today's price-to-earnings ratio of about 20 underestimates the long-term possibilites for this leading disruptive innovator.

If disruptive innovators are what you're interested in, The Motley Fool has compiled a new report called "The Only Stock You Need to Profit From the NEW Technology Revolution." The report highlights a company that has gained 300% since first recommended by Fool analysts but still has plenty of room left to run. To get instant access to the name of this company transforming the IT industry, click here -- it's free.

Should This Company's Performance Scare Oil Refiners?

For years oil refiners have been riding the gravy train thanks to a large gap in domestic and foreign crude prices. For some refiners, this quarter was no different, but HollyFrontier (NYSE: HFC  ) didn't quite live up to expectations. Some of the disappointment has to do with the company's operations, but the narrowing of the price gap between foreign and domestic crude could be a troubling sign for refiners.

Some refiners will be able to weather the storm better than others, but there are some trends that investors can watch that should give them a picture of oil refiners' health in the future. In this video, Fool.com contributor Tyler Crowe looks at some of the refiners that could continue going strong and what signs of trouble investors should look out for.

If you're on the lookout for some currently intriguing energy plays, check out The Motley Fool's "3 Stocks for $100 Oil." For FREE access to this special report, simply click here now.

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Xerox Corp Selling IT Outsourcing Unit for $1.05B (XRX)

Before the opening bell on Friday morning, it was announced that French company Atos SA will buy Xerox’s (XRX) IT outsourcing unit for $1.05 billion in cash.

Atos SA is a computer services firm, and its purchase of this Xerox unit will give the France-based company a stronger foothold in the U.S. Xerox’s IT outsourcing unit has annual revenues of $1.5 billion. The deal is expected to close during the first half of 2015.

Xerox stock was up 52 cents, or 2.59%, in pre-market trading. YTD, the stock is up 14.13%.

XRX Dividend Snapshot

As of Market Close on December 18, 2014

XRX dividend yield annual payout payout ratio dividend growth

Click here to see the complete history of XRX dividends.

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on News Feed, Messenger, & the Gray T-Shirt

SAN DIEGO, CALIF. (The Street) -- A week after being peppered by Wall Street analysts, Facebook (FB) Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg answered to a more important audience -- the 1.35 billion people who use his social network each month -- and revealed something the world has always wanted to know.

Why does Zuckerberg wear the same gray t-shirt every day? For starters, it's not the exact same shirt, he insisted with back up from COO Sheryl Sandberg, as he owns more than one, but more to the point, the Facebook CEO said he'd rather focus all of his energy on Facebook.

"I want to clear my life, so I have to make as few decisions as possible," he said. 

Must Read: Are Facebook and Twitter Your Next Impulse Shopping Destination? The revelation was made during Facebook's first-ever public question-and-answer session, streamed live Thursday evening to viewers from a special Facebook event page. In the week preceding the event, Zuckerberg fielded questions through a new Facebook event page called "Q&A with Mark, " and also took audience questions from a small crowd gathered at the company's Menlo Park, Calif., headquarters. Zuckerberg addressed some of Facebook members' biggest concerns, including questions as to when businesses can expect better distribution for their stories and why Facebook is forcing its users to install Messenger as a separate mobile application. Arguably, the most material disclosure came in response to a question on information overload. Zuckerberg used the query as an opportunity to promise more controls for News Feed. Facebook, he said, is working on tools to help members "tune" their News Feed, though he didn't reveal specifics.  "This is something we've heard very loud and clear from a lot of people in our community, that it's very important to you," he said. Ultimately, the company wants News Feed to be "the perfect personalized newspaper for every person in the world." As for Facebook's controversial decision to separate Messenger from the main Facebook app, Zuckerberg wasn't exactly apologetic, but he was empathetic, saying he understood that it was "a big ask" to get people to install another application. "The reason we wanted to do this is because we really believe this is a better experience," he said. "We know messaging is one of the few things that people actually do more than social networking .... Even though it was a short-term, painful thing ... we knew we could never deliver the quality of experience inside the tab of the main Facebook app." The decision, despite being incredibly unpopular, has led to Messenger being the top downloaded app on Apple's App Store and Google Play for several weeks running. Unfortunately, Zuckerberg did not offer encouraging news for businesses who operate Facebook Pages and rely on the organic reach of their status updates -- a.k.a. free distribution to fans through News Feed -- to make an impression on customers. The executive, who made certain to stress that his company provides a "free" way to communicate with customers, said that Facebook will always default to optimizing the feed for members over businesses. The average person could see up to 1,500 stories per day, but only actually gets to 100 or so, he said, which means that only the "highest quality content" will get through. Zuckerberg's question-and-answer session comes a little more than a week after Facebook reported better-than-expected third quarter revenue of $3.2 billion and adjusted earnings per share of 42 cents. The social network company, however, spooked investors by talking up its plans to spend heavily in future quarters. CFO Dave Wehner guided Wall Street with the glum revelation that total costs in 2015 would increase between 55% and 75% over 2014. Facebook shares closed up Thursday around half a percent at $75.26, but remain discounted by more than 6% from prices before the company reported third-quarter results last week. Must Read: 3 Biggest Takeaways from Facebook's Third-Quarter Earnings Report --Written by Jennifer van Grove in San Diego, Calif. >Contact by Email. Follow @jbruin

Monday, December 22, 2014

Why the Treasury's New Tax Inversion Tactics Miss the Mark

France Burger King Claude Paris/AP Until April 15 approaches every year, it's hard for many Americans to pay much attention to tax issues. But the recent surge in the number of U.S. companies using a popular tax-cutting strategy known as a tax inversion has led to extensive controversy, with proponents of the strategy arguing that it's entirely legal while opponents worry about the loss of U.S. corporate tax revenue. Moreover, political fallout from having well-known companies like Burger King Worldwide (BKW), AbbVie (ABBV) and Medtronic (MDT) flee for foreign countries almost guaranteed that the U.S. government would take action. Earlier this week, the Treasury Department finally fought back, with new rules designed to limit some of the most common ways that companies structure tax inversions, but they fail to address the deeper issue that led to the use of tax inversions and similar tax-saving devices in the first place. What Tax Inversions Are and Why They're a Big Deal The reason that tax inversions have generated so much controversy is that they effectively take away U.S. tax revenue without having much meaningful impact on the way a company does business. A tax inversion involves a U.S. company buying out a foreign company, with the resulting combined business taking the tax home of the foreign company. Because most foreign tax systems have lower tax rates on businesses than the U.S. corporate tax rate of 35 percent, major corporations can save billions of dollars over the long run by moving abroad. Until now, moreover, it was relatively easy for companies to do tax inversions. Despite rules designed to limit their use, tax inversions involved huge U.S. companies merging with much smaller foreign companies. For instance, AbbVie is almost twice as big as its target, Shire, even after Shire shares soared following the buyout announcement. Medtronic has a similar size advantage compared to target Covidien (COV). What the Treasury Did In its notice to the public, the Treasury took a hard stance on trying to eliminate tax inversions. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew characterized the new rules as "meaningfully reducing the economic benefits of inversions after the fact, and when possible, stopping them altogether." The rules themselves are complicated, but they seek to make tax inversions harder to structure. One rule change essentially doubles the required size of the foreign target company, with potential adverse consequences if shareholders of the U.S. company own as little as 60 percent of the combined company's stock. Another prevents a U.S. company from using tactics like paying special dividends to reduce its relative size or moving assets into a foreign subsidiary that it then spins off to its shareholders. Other rules go beyond the tax inversion strategy, limiting the ability of companies to access cash from their foreign subsidiaries through loans. Why the Treasury's Moves Aren't Enough Yet critics were quick to note that the new rules don't go far enough. CNBC commentator Josh Brown pointed out that the rules do nothing to stop U.S. companies from accumulating assets in overseas subsidiaries and keeping them outside the U.S. indefinitely. Under current tax law, such moves never require the U.S. parent company to pay taxes on the foreign income. Even the Treasury admits that these measures won't solve the true problem involved in enforcing U.S. tax rules in a global economy. As Lew said, "comprehensive business tax reform that includes specific anti-inversion provisions is the best way to address the recent surge of inversions," but the Treasury felt that taking what action it could now would be better than doing nothing. More broadly, the global economy makes it easier than ever for companies to shop for countries that offer the best tax incentives. Just as U.S. companies routinely get large tax breaks from state and local governments that want to lure new business prospects to their areas, so too have entire nations sought the business of the largest multinational corporations, touting their much-lower corporate tax rates and the availability of legal tax laws to help them minimize their worldwide tax liability. The Treasury's efforts to control tax inversions are an important first step. But without full-blown tax reform to align the U.S. foreign tax system with the rest of the world, the Treasury's move won't solve the larger problem and will instead give companies an incentive to find other innovative methods to cut their tax bills.

Affected: 56 million cards. Duration of compromise: Five months. Tactic: Malware was installed to skim payment card data; unclear how hackers found an entry into the company's network.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

Retirement Planning: Don't Give In to Pessimism

Retirement planning pessimists got you worried? Take this message to heart, along with a little education. Photo: Flickr user Andre Ribeirinho.

It's no secret that when it comes to retirement planning, we Americans are playing a game of catch-up. Sometimes the numbers can seem so overwhelming that it's easy just to throw our hands up and concede that we're headed toward doom and gloom. That's exactly what an article from the Huffington Post did last week, stating that, "retirement at 65 is a fairy tale."

But that's a trap we can't fall into -- least of all here at The Motley Fool. Our purpose is simple: to help the world invest better. When it comes to confronting these bleak retirement-planning figures, that means avoiding the impulse to complain and focusing instead on what we, as individual investors, can control.

First, we must question the conclusions that the pessimists come to. And second, we need to identify concrete steps anyone can make to shore up their retirement plans.

Opinion, meet fact
The aforementioned Huffington Post article is a prime example of pessimistic thinking. The author cites a November 2014 report from the Center for a Secure Retirement to come to a host of negative conclusions.

I read the report -- which surveyed 1,000 adults between the ages of 50 and 68 who have between $25,000 and $100,000 in yearly income -- and I'm still trying to figure out how the author made such gigantic leaps in her conclusions.

Here are a few key examples:

Of the respondents, 45 percent were already retired, noted the press release. You say 'retired,' I say 'lost their job and couldn't find another one.'

While the 45% figure is correct, nowhere does the report mention how or why people entered retirement. It's possible that some were forced into retirement before they were ready. But the fact that such a large portion of this cohort was already retired makes the claim that retirement at 65 is a "fairy tale" seem dubious at best.

Once upon a time ... there lived a generation of people who as a birthday present to themselves, wrapped up their careers when they turned 65 ... never to step foot in an office again.

The grass is always greener, and the past was always better, right? Actually, if you dig into the numbers, you might be surprised.

As fellow Fool Morgan Housel has shown, this is the biggest retirement myth ever told. For starters, the very concept of retirement only became popular after World War II -- meaning its time in existence accounts for about 0.01% of human history.

And those pensions that were available to "everyone"? According to the Employee Retirement Benefits Institute, the number of Americans with pensions peaked in the 1990s, when 40% of workers had them -- and that includes public employees.

This quote actually comes from the Center for a Secure Retirement's study, not the Huffington Post article:

Two-thirds (62%) of middle-income Boomers express some doubts that they will have enough money to live comfortably throughout retirement.

But even here, there's a noticeable bias at play. Here's what the numbers actually looked like:

Source: Center for a Secure Retirement. 

One could just as easily have lumped the middle group into the opposite category and concluded that, "Three-quarters (75%) of respondents were at least somewhat confident about their retirement savings." That isn't to say that this is the "correct" representation of the data, but rather that this data is open to interpretation.

More importantly, concerns about finances are common among people heading into uncharted financial waters, such as retirement. But a Merrill Lynch/Age Wave study found that, by a factor of two to one, those concerns were largely overblown, and the real obstacle that retirees weren't prepared for was the loss of social connections.

Here are steps anyone can take to help themselves
The most disappointing thing about the Huffington Post article is that, when it came to advice, the simple conclusion was "that we all invest in our health and stay on the job as long as we can."

But this ignores scores of important, viable suggestions that the Center for a Secure Retirement's report made. Among those suggestions:

Educate yourself. Of those surveyed, 63% either didn't own mutual funds or did not know the difference between passively managed and actively managed portfolios. This is an important distinction, because actively managed funds tend to cost significantly more and can erode retirement savings. Seek guidance from a financial professional. About 60% of those surveyed did not consult a financial professional for help with retirement planning. The most common reason respondents gave was that they "prefer to make financial decisions on their own." That's fair enough, but among those who did consult a professional, 87% were "very satisfied or completely satisfied with their professional." Practice healthy financial habits. The basic steps of retirement planning are simple: Spend less than you earn and invest the difference. Repeat over and over for your entire working life. Consider your home. For most people, their home is the most valuable asset they own. It's great to have a place to live, but if you're in a retirement planning crunch, consider downsizing to help raise funds.

By acknowledging the cold, hard facts -- but remaining optimistically focused on solutions -- you can greatly improve your retirement planning situation.

One way YOU can get more income in retirement
If you're ready to take the reins of your retirement planning, we've got something for you. In a brand-new free report, our retirement experts explain a straightforward strategy that people are already using to secure an even more comfortable retirement. The method is so simple you'll be shocked you didn't think of it yourself. To access this free report instantly, simply click here now.

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Herbalife Shares Slump 10% On EPS

(Photo by: Heidi Gutman/CNBC)

Nutrition supplement company Herbalife reported disappointing earnings, and shares slid lower in after-market trading.

Herbalife (HLF) reported second-quarter adjusted profit of $1.55 per share, a 10% increase over the prior-year results. But analysts expected Herbalife to post second-quarter earnings of $1.57 per share, according to FactSet and MarketWatch.

Shares of Herbalife, down 10%, cascaded lower as the headline rippled through after-market trading. The stock rose 2% Monday in regular trading, anticipating better news.

In its press release on results, Herbalife said second-quarter worldwide volume increased 5% compared to the prior year period. The company raised its fiscal 2014 adjusted earnings-per-share guidance to a range of $6.17 to $6.32 per share.

Herbalife had reported better-than-expected earnings for 21 quarters in a row. High-profile investor Carl Icahn has defended the business in the face of short-seller Bill Ackman of Pershing Square, who thinks Herbalife is a pyramid scheme.

 

Wheat Futures Lower, Corn Futures Nearly Unchanged

March Chicago Wheat Futures ended the day lower at 632¼, down 23 cents. March Kansas City Wheat Futures closed down about 18 cents at 665 3/4.

Both markets sold off overnight, recovered some during the trading session and eventually closed down off the mid-day highs.

March Corn ended the day nearly unchanged at 410½, down 1/2 a cent.

Posted-In: Futures Commodities Markets

© 2014 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

  Related Articles LinkedIn, Other Internet Stocks Reaching Record Highs Did Mark Cuban Really Finalize A Game-Changing Trade At The Colbert Report? Red Hat Analyst Roundup After Q3 Earnings Soybeans End Day Lower, Soybean Oil Ends Higher Tesla Unveils Its First Battery Swap Station NY Soft Commodities End Quiet Day Of Trading Mixed Around the Web, We're Loving... World Cup Championship of Binary Options! Huanity's Last Great Hope: Venture Capitalists Don't Miss The Next Webinar to Advance your Trading Will Apple Redefine How We Shop? What Did Josh Brown Say On Our Morning Show? We're Now Hiring Journalists for our Newsdesk!

Thursday, December 18, 2014

What We All Can Learn from the Military's Payday Loan Problem

Payday Loans sign glows in green neon on a black background Getty Images As a 19-year-old, Robert Knoll made a mistake that many young people do -- he got into debt. Knoll did it by living beyond his meager salary as a U.S. Marine, and using small payday loans to help him get by between paychecks. "The problem, though, is it puts you behind the next payday," Knoll says. Those $80 to $200 payday loans added up, along with the $50 in interest he'd pay to borrow $200 for five days. With an annual percentage rate on the loan of more than 200 percent, Knoll would post-date a check for $250 for a $200 loan that would be paid off five days later when his paycheck was deposited into his checking account. "You can spend your entire paycheck before you get it," says Knoll, now an account executive at DRIVEN Public Relations in Temecula, California. He retired as a Marine master sergeant in 2013. Help From the ARK Unlike servicemembers today, Knoll didn't have help from the military on payday loans back then. One program that officials are trying to remind military members and their families about is the Asset Recovery Kit. For a $5 fee, members of 17 credit unions supported by the Pentagon Federal Credit Union Foundation can borrow up to $500 interest-free for 30 days. The program has loaned more than $3.8 million in 8,724 loans since it started in 2004, says Jane Whitfield, president and CEO of the PenFed Foundation. "We want to help in preventing short-term emergencies becoming long-term problems," she says.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Here's What You Should Do With Your Year-End Bonus

Christmas Bonus Getty Images For a lot of people, the end of the year is a time of celebration. Not just because of the holidays and family - but also for the big end-of-the-year bonus that gets paid out for all the work you've done over the last 12 months. More than half of all employers give out a year-end bonus that might be monetary in nature or come in the form of other benefits like gifts cards or employee gift registries. Monetary bonuses can differ in appearance too from direct paycheck compensation to 401(k) contributions. Some people refer to this type of bonus as a Christmas bonus. While bonuses have experienced a downward trend over the last few years due to the recession, the average bonus was about 1.3 months of salary in 2013, according to JobsDB.com. Wall Street Takes the Cake for Year-End Bonuses It's no secret that the biggest year-end bonuses go to those who work on Wall Street. These bonuses can run from a few thousand for a secretary to millions for higher-level management. In 2013, the average Wall Street bonus rose 15 percent to $164,530, according to The New York Times. That's still tame compared to the biggest bonuses paid out to Wall Street executives. The top three bonuses of 2013 - paid to Michael Farrell, Ian Cumming and Leslie Moonves - alone added up to around $84 million, according to Forbes. Farrell's bonus was earned on only a partial year of work. $29 million -– Michael Farrell, former CEO of Annaly Capital Management $27.5 million -– Ian Cumming, CEO of Leucadia National Corp. $27.5 million -– Leslie Moonves, CEO of CBS (CBS) While we can safely assume these people have a huge tax bill at the end of the year, you might be surprised to know that - whether you received one hundred thousand dollars or just a few hundred bucks - the tax rate on bonuses remains the same for most. How Your Bonus Gets Taxed The first thing you'll probably notice when receiving a bonus check is how much gets taken out in taxes. It's not complicated, and it is taxed under a different set of rules than your standard income is. Bonuses, commissions and prizes are all considered supplemental wages and are subject to a supplemental wage tax. If you have more than one million in supplemental wages for the year, your employer must withhold tax at the highest federal rate of 39.6 percent. If it's less than that amount, then it depends on how the wages are paid. If your bonus is not designated as a supplemental wage, taxes are withheld based on your W-4 form. However, if this income is noted separately, your employer must withhold 25 percent or combine your regular and supplemental earnings in one pay period and apply the regularly withholding rates. Note how this tax could differ from a graduated income tax, which is adjusted based on income bracket. Putting That Bonus to Work The most exciting part of getting a bonus is deciding how to spend it. Many financial planners like to use the 50-30-20 rule: 50 percent of your budget toward necessities (food, water, shelter, transportation etc.) and paying down debt, 30 for discretionary use, and 20 percent toward savings. Instant paydays are easy to celebrate and can provide an excuse for lavish spending, at least once a year; however, a more appropriate use of that bonus is to get yourself more organized financially. If you have debt, that bonus can wipe it out or at least reduce it substantially. You'll save money on interest payments over the long term and improve your credit score, as well, which will lead to even more savings moving forward. A good financial plan includes at least three to six months worth of emergency savings built up. If you haven't done that, you might consider funding an emergency account. You never know when the unexpected will happen and knowing that you're prepared take a lot of worry and stress out of unforeseen circumstances. The holiday season is also a period of budget busting, as the average shopper will spend $804.42 this year celebrating Christmas, Hanukkah or Kwanzaa, according to the National Retail Federation. Much of this spending will end up on credit cards, which could take shoppers several months to pay off, potentially at the detriment of their credit scores. Of course, working all year long and having nothing to show for it isn't a great reward system. If your finances are squared away, go ahead and splurge a little, as this could also be a good opportunity to indulge and fight off frugal fatigue. Take the family on vacation or buy something you know you'll enjoy. If you've made sure to put some of that bonus toward debt and savings to make financial progress, if needed, then you can spend the rest guilt free.